Cotton Replant Decisions

  • Cotton replant decisions involve much consideration prior to replanting the crop.

  • Cotton stands with a minimum of one to two healthy plants per foot may be acceptable, especially if the stand is uniformly spaced with minimal skips.

  • If there is any doubt after stand assessment and careful consideration, it is probably best not to replant.

Evaluating the Existing Stand

 

Replanting should be considered if at least half of the field has 3-foot skips and the remaining plants are healthy. If the remaining plants are stressed, then a maximum of 2-foot skips should be applied. Large skips should be measured accordingly. A 6-foot skip should be measured as two 3-foot skips.1 

Figure 1. Cotton stand with skips in the row Figure 1. Cotton stand with skips in the row

To evaluate a stand, measure the row length needed for 1/1000th of an acre (Table 1) and count the number of plants within the measured row length. Multiply this number by 1000 to determine the plant population per acre. This should be completed at ten locations throughout the field.Make note of crop condition, uniformity, and frequency of skips larger than 2 to 3 feet per foot of row. Uneven plant spacing, including skips in the row, can lead to significant yield reductions even if the average number of plants per acre is adequate for optimum yields.

The condition of the crop and the growing conditions determine whether the remaining stand can recover. Plants cut off below the cotyledons will not survive. Those with deep stem bruises may not recover. If viable buds remain on plants that lost terminals, the plants may survive. Plants with viable stems, having whole leaves or even portions of damaged leaves, have a good chance of surviving. Poor weather conditions (cloudy, cool, wet) can cause damaged or diseased plants to deteriorate rapidly, even after the weather turns hot and sunny. Growers should dig plants and examine roots and stems to determine viability. Black, water-soaked tap roots indicate that disease is present. If the tap root is still intact and the outer covering has hardened, recovery potential is improved. If further disease damage is evident, the stem can be cut lengthwise to check for discoloration in the vascular tissues. Wet weather blight (Ascochyta blight), as well as other disease organisms, may invade the damaged vascular system. If the weather forecast remains marginal, it is best to assume that only the healthiest plants will survive.

Delaying an evaluation for two to three days of good growing conditions after the initial damage can provide a better indication of how many plants will likely survive. Cotton has an incredible ability to recover from adverse conditions, so the final judgment on the extent of damage should consider crop and growing conditions.

Understanding Why the Stand is Low

 

Evaluating the condition of the crop can help provide information about why the stand is lower than expected. Disease or insect-damaged seedlings can indicate environmental conditions conducive for damage or a failed pest management program. A hail event can lead to damaged or lost cotyledons, bruised stems, and split terminals. Yield potential can be reduced by approximately 35% when the terminal and both cotyledons are damaged, assuming the plant survives.3 Deer-damaged terminals can lower yield potential by around 25 to 30%, with 4- to 6-leaf cotton having more potential for loss compared to 2- to 3-leaf cotton.1

Soil crusting or compaction can prevent emergence, especially in fields with clay soils drying out after a heavy rain. An early indication of soil crusting is swollen seedling hypocotyls near the soil surface. Light crust busting or rotary hoeing may be necessary to alleviate any crusting. These practices must be completed quickly and carefully to increase the chance of an optimal stand.3 Marginal soil moisture can lead to stand establishment failure, especially when followed by dry conditions. Planting deep to plant into moisture can also lead to lower than expected stands. Noticing a pattern of poor germination in the field is most likely due to equipment errors like the planter planting a row too deep or an issue with the sprayer. 

Herbicides can lead to damaged seedlings, especially after a heavy rainfall. Most of the time, cotton seedlings can grow out of the damage by three to four weeks without a significant loss to yield potential if the herbicide was applied at label rates. It is important to limit any additional stress to the crop to help maintain yield potential.4

Making the Decision to Replant

 

There are three options available when considering replanting cotton: keep the stand, kill the stand and replant, or replant low-population areas of a field. There are several factors to consider when making this decision:

Probability of a better stand. If planting conditions have not improved since the first planting, then the likelihood of a better outcome for a replant is low.3

Calendar date. Planting later than the recommended window can limit heat unit accumulation and push boll production into periods of heavy insect pressure and risk of freeze damage.2 This can result in reduced fiber quality, delayed harvest, increased harvest costs, and lower yields. 

Costs to replant. Seed costs, fuel, equipment wear, labor, and any pesticide application expenses can limit profitability on a replant. In some replant situations, seed and technology fees may be refunded. Also consider crop insurance coverage, farm program options, and the potential for planting an alternative crop.

Availability of seed. An earlier-maturing variety can help with a shortened growing season, and availability of a selected variety can be limited. Switching to a different crop may be a possibility for certain situations. 

Previously-applied herbicides. Fields with previously-applied herbicides may require additional management consideration when making replant decisions. It may be necessary to push off the top of the seedbed to remove potentially high concentrations of preemergence herbicides applied with the first planting. Some herbicide programs may have plant-back restrictions that can prevent or complicate a replant.5

Large skips. Depending on the condition and uniformity of the stand, it may be possible to fill in skips by replanting portions of the field. This is only recommended if performed within 14 days of the original planting date to reduce management problems later in the season. Plants with different ages can complicate pest management, harvest aid timing, and harvest.5 Cotton varieties should be selected with similar growth habits, maturity, and herbicide technology as those of the first planting. 

Managing the Crop 

 

Choosing to keep the original stand can result in delayed harvest timing to wait for second and third position bolls to open. Limiting stress on the crop will be important so the plants can focus energy on boll production and maturation. 

Replanting the field begins with burndown of the previous planting to prevent competition with the replanted crop. An earlier maturing variety should be selected to help manage for earliness. Seeding rates should be slightly increased and planted shallow.3 Fertility levels may need to be adjusted, along with irrigation scheduling, and managing for earliness. Closely monitor pest pressure and crop growth and make timely insecticide and PGR applications.5 Management strategies should be altered and fine-tuned to match the remaining growing season.

For either situation, it is important to establish a realistic yield goal. A low stand or a replant will need to be managed for earliness and protected to retain the bolls produced.2 There may not be enough time or heat units available to make up for lost fruiting positions. 

For more information on managing for earliness, read the Spotlight, Cotton Planting Populations and Row Spacing.

 

 

Sources:

1 Edmisten, K. and Collins, G. 2019. North Carolina cotton: Making replanting decisions—quickly, carefully. AgFax. https://agfax.com/2019/06/01/north-carolina-cotton-replanting-decisions-quick-by-careful/.

2 Butler, S. and Raper, T. 2019. Making the cotton replant decision. The University of Tennessee. W 073. https://extension.tennessee.edu/publications/Documents/W073.pdf.

3 Collins, G. and Edmisten, K. 2019. Late planting and evaluating hail damage. NC State Extension. https://cotton.ces.ncsu.edu/2019/06/late-planting-evaluating-hail-damage-collins-edmisten/.

4 Majumdar, A. 2017. Alabama cotton, peanuts: Herbicide injury from excessive rains—8 frequently asked questions. AgFax. https://agfaxweedsolutions.com/2017/06/16/alabama-cotton-peanuts-herbicide-injury-excessive-rains-8-frequently-asked-questions/.

Morgan, G., Isakeit, T., and Kerns, D. 2018. Cotton replanting decisions in 2018. Texas A&M AgriLife Extension. https://agrilife.org/texasrowcrops/2018/05/02/replanting-decisions-in-2018/

Web sources verified 03/03/20.

 4016_S1

 

This browser is no longer supported. Please switch to a supported browser: Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Safari.